Wednesday, December 18, 2013
The first steps have been taken toward preventing the National Security Agency from collecting information in bulk through phone records and other metadata.
A federal judge ruled Monday that the agency’s phone data program violates the Constitution. The decision is pending appeal and the federal government will likely fight it in courts for months to come.
In all likelihood, the U.S. Supreme Court will have the final say.
However, this is an important first step in holding the federal government accountable to the same laws that bind the rest of us.
The Fourth Amendment is clearly designed to prevent illegal search and seizure — yet, that’s exactly what most people would classify the tapping of cellphones without the owner’s knowledge or consent, or without any evidence of a crime having been committed.
This should have been a fairly straightforward decision.
Even for the people that aren’t fearful of Big Brother’s watchful eyes, we should not stand for a government that is illegally watching its citizens and collecting massive amounts of data — much of which is useless, mundane info on the everyday conversations of everyday people.
Hopefully, the U.S. Supreme Court, when it takes a crack at the phone data program, will feel the same way.
More like this story
- Proposal would change name of Squaw Creek
- Russian hackers tried to get into state election system -- and failed
- Extension hosts Women in Agriculture conference
- Woodcutting restrictions reduced in forest
- 'Healing the Columbia' features tribal members
- State delays fisher reintroduction in North Cascades
- Diamond Creek Fire 70 percent contained
- AAA: Truck safety technology can prevent crashes
- Methow school board meetings changed
- Concert features Turkish music duo